I like this teacher - Router Forums
 33Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-16-2019, 09:55 AM Thread Starter
Honored Member
 
harrysin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Country: Australia
First Name: Harry
Posts: 14,631
     
Send a message via Skype™ to harrysin
Default I like this teacher

Attention, students. Because so many of you missed Friday’s classes, what with your little climate party and all, today I’m assigning extra work.
Let’s begin with mathematics. 558,400,000 is a really big number. Can anyone here tell me what it might represent? No?
Well, that’s the amount in tonnes of carbon dioxide that Australia emitted last year.
I’ll just pause here for a minute until Samantha stops crying. By the way, Samantha, your sign at the climate rally needed a possessive apostrophe and “planet” was spelled incorrectly, so I’m putting you back in remedial English again.
Where were we? Oh, yes. 558,400,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
Let’s see how we can reduce that number. Ban coal mining? That’ll knock off a big chunk.
Ban petrol-powered vehicles? Good call. That’s another slab of emissions gone.
Does the class believe we should ban all mining? You do. Interesting. For your homework tonight, I want you all to design batteries that contain no nickel or cadmium.
Good luck getting to school in electric cars without those.
And there’ll be no more steel wind turbines once the iron ore mines are closed. It’s just the price we’ll have to pay, I suppose.
Even with all those bans, however, Australia will still be churning out carbon dioxide by the magical solar-powered truckload. Cuts need to go much further.
More people means more human activity which means more carbon dioxide, so let’s permanently ban immigration. Is the class agreed?
Hmmm. You’re not quite so enthusiastic about that one. Come on, students. Sacrifices must be made.
Speaking of which, how many of you have grandparents? Not any more you don’t.
And Samantha is crying again. Can someone please take her to the school safe space and let her “process some emotions”, or whatever the hell it is you kids do in there? Thank you.
Sing along with Kim Carnes: “All the world knows of her charms/She’s got/Stop Adani arms”
Who agrees we need to simplify our lives in order to reduce emissions? Returning to earlier times, when emissions were much lower, might help save our earth.
So goodbye to air travel, the internet and your cell phones. People got by without them in the past and they’ll survive without them in our sustainable future.
Still, those emissions will be way too high. Just for fun, let’s ban Australia and see what happens.
All factories, houses, streets, farms – gone. All people gone. Every atom of human presence on this land mass, completely erased.
At that point we’ll have finally cut our emissions to nothing. We’ve subtracted an annual 558,400,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Congratulations, children. By eliminating Australia, you’ve just reduced the world’s yearly generation of carbon dioxide from 37,100,000,000 tonnes to just … 36,541,600,000 tonnes.
Still, every tiny reduction helps, right? Maybe not. Let’s have a quick geography lesson. Tyler, please point out China on this map. No; that’s Luxembourg. China is a bit bigger. Try over here. There you go.
Here’s the thing about China. How long will it take for China to produce the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide that we’ve slashed by vanishing Australia? One year? Two years? Five years?
Not quite. Start the carbon dioxide clock on China right now, and that one enormous nation will have matched our annual output by October 10. China adds a whole Australia to the global emissions total every twenty days.
For that matter, China will have added another 1,190,953 tonnes by the end of this one-hour class.
Even a tiny increase in China’s output puts Australia in the shade. Various experts last year estimated that China was on course for a five per cent carbon dioxide boost.
This would mean an extra 521,637,550 tonnes – or basically what Australia generates. Our total is the same as China’s gentle upswing.
So maybe your protest was in the wrong country. Here’s another assignment: write letters to the Chinese government demanding it stops dragging people out of poverty.
Make sure you include your full name and address, because the Chinese government is kind of big on keeping records. Send a photograph of yourself standing in front of your parents’ house.
You might repeat this process in India. In fact, rather than going to Europe for your next big family holiday, prevail upon your parents to visit India instead. The tiny village of Salaidih would be the perfect place to tell slum-dwelling residents they shouldn’t have electricity.
They’ll probably thank you for it. Or they should, if they aren’t stupid climate deniers. Indian paupers must avoid making the same tragic affluence mistakes as us, so we must keep their carbon footprints as tiny as possible.
Can you imagine how terrible is would be for the earth if all of India’s one billion-plus population owned cars and air-conditioners? It really doesn’t bear thinking about.
One further assignment: tonight, locate a clean, green alternative source for $66 billion in exports. That’s how much was raised last year by the Australian coal industry.
Working it out won’t be too much of a challenge, I’m sure. After all, you know science and stuff. About half of your signs on Friday claimed you know more about all these things than does the Prime Minister.
Show him how advanced your brains are by devising a brand-new multi-billion export bonanza.
Hey, look who’s back! Feeling better, Samantha? That’s nice. Feelings are the most important thing of all.”
Attached Images
 

Harry



Nothing but heaven itself is better than a friend who is really a friend. - Plautus






harrysin is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 09:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Country: United States
First Name: Art
Posts: 1,467
 
Default

The teacher would probably get fired for pointing this out.
mgmine is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 09:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: United States
First Name: Larry
Posts: 1,382
 
Default

Very interesting Harry
Knot working is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 10:00 AM
Registered User
 
Chris Itin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Country: United States
First Name: Chris
Posts: 17
 
Default

Harry, thank you for this post.
Our children and grandchildren NEED good shot of reality and fact interjected into their narratives.
Herb Stoops and jj777746 like this.

Getting old ain't for sissies.
Chris Itin is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 11:41 AM
Registered User
 
Nickp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: United States
First Name: Nick
Posts: 3,672
 
Default

Good article, Harry...I'm not saying "do nothing"...but a bit of reality always helps to put things into perspective...

Can you imagine...? If there were not an internet there would be no RouterForum...OMG...! ! !
Herb Stoops and jj777746 like this.

Nick

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
GIVE A MAN A FISH and you feed him for a day.
TEACH HIM HOW TO FISH and you feed him for his life time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Nickp is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 12:07 PM
Forum Contributor
 
DesertRatTom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Country: United States
First Name: Tom
Posts: 16,741
 
Default

Lost track of the source, but it was a fairly conservative one. They concluded that the very best existing way to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was to plant more trees. By that standard, Jean and I are already carbon neutral by a factor of 2. Drives me nuts that way people have bought into the man made climate thing based on CO2. I have no argument against reduction of real pollution, but calling CO2 a pollutant is a fraud. And as CO2 rises, we've already seen an increase in tree and other plant growth rates.

The other point about denying development to the billions living in poverty, no one explains it better than Hans Rosling in his TED talk, "The Magic Washing Machine." Well worth watching...

Who are we willing to condemn to living in grinding poverty in order to pump trillions into the pockets of crooked academics and corporations chomping at the bit to provide costly, as yet unknown cures for this (maybe it's a) problem.


The more I do, the less I accomplish.

Last edited by DesertRatTom; 10-19-2019 at 12:12 PM.
DesertRatTom is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 04:04 PM
Registered User
 
Knothead47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: United States
First Name: John
Posts: 2,558
 
Default

Harry, if we eliminate Australia, where will the rest of the world get their Foster's Beer? I can see the beer bottle labels now- Made in China!
harrysin likes this.

John T.
Life is like water-skiing; if you slow down, you go down.
Knothead47 is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 08:42 PM
pal
Registered User
 
pal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: Australia
First Name: Harold
Posts: 392
 
Default

John they probably all ready are made in china

Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.

Albert Einstein
pal is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-19-2019, 10:42 PM
Registered User
 
RainMan 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Country: Canada
First Name: Rick
Posts: 16,208
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertRatTom View Post
Lost track of the source, but it was a fairly conservative one. They concluded that the very best existing way to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was to plant more trees. By that standard, Jean and I are already carbon neutral by a factor of 2. Drives me nuts that way people have bought into the man made climate thing based on CO2. I have no argument against reduction of real pollution, but calling CO2 a pollutant is a fraud. And as CO2 rises, we've already seen an increase in tree and other plant growth rates.

The other point about denying development to the billions living in poverty, no one explains it better than Hans Rosling in his TED talk, "The Magic Washing Machine." Well worth watching...

Who are we willing to condemn to living in grinding poverty in order to pump trillions into the pockets of crooked academics and corporations chomping at the bit to provide costly, as yet unknown cures for this (maybe it's a) problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZoKfap4g4w
Great analogy that video provides . People are so clueless . If your so concerned and want to do your part , go to the back of your house and turn your gas off
harrysin likes this.

I don’t always insulate , but when I do .
Ok ,I never insulate
RainMan 2.0 is online now  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old 10-20-2019, 01:00 AM
Registered User
 
gdonham1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: United States
First Name: Guy
Posts: 216
 
Default

Did you know that carbon dioxide is only 0.0391 percent of the atmosphere. Do you think we import carbon dioxide from space. The carbon dioxide is already here on the earth. Harry is right if we all live in a cave and use leaves for toilet paper (dont use poison ivy) then we can begin to reduce carbon dioxide in a few million years. I hope they come up with a more efficient method to make power but until they do I will keep driving, flying and using toilet paper. What really makes carbon dioxide is the wasted energy climate changers make with useless protests and empty and meaningless gestures.

One way we could reduce carbon is to fill the empty air heads of the students protesting and demanding change with the excess carbon, maybe that would use up a few thimbles of carbon displacing their brains with carbon.
gdonham1 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Router Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome