Nice looking plugs Doug. I just used the ones that came with my vacuum when I got it but I think one is now cracked, duct tape will likely be used to repair. 3D printers certainly have their place. I always figured once I have one of everything else I'd probably get one.
There have a been a fair number of times when working in the observatory with a new telescope, CCD camera, or other component that I wished I had something to make the threaded adapters I needed for the perfect spacing. Spacing is key for keeping the perfect spacing of the mirrors/lens to surface of the CCD chip. Tilt is critical as well and then of course it can't be reflective.
I'll be working on a 24" Ritchey Chretien telescope soon out in California, a bit remote location, and having something like that may well prove it's worth alone. Largest diameter adapters would be 4" threaded fittings. Wall thickness would be dependent on load of the camera, filter wheel, focuser, rotator, adaptive optic unit, spectrograph, and so on. Of course not all of these are mounted at the same time. In this case however a turret to select the component to use would also be in the mix.
So yeah, this could be handy....Any idea if you can do specific threads on one of these? Being lazy, I can look that up but if it doesn't do anything more than produce a working prototype before heading to the machine shop (really expensive) to produce a proven spacer it can be worth it.
There have a been a fair number of times when working in the observatory with a new telescope, CCD camera, or other component that I wished I had something to make the threaded adapters I needed for the perfect spacing. Spacing is key for keeping the perfect spacing of the mirrors/lens to surface of the CCD chip. Tilt is critical as well and then of course it can't be reflective.
I'll be working on a 24" Ritchey Chretien telescope soon out in California, a bit remote location, and having something like that may well prove it's worth alone. Largest diameter adapters would be 4" threaded fittings. Wall thickness would be dependent on load of the camera, filter wheel, focuser, rotator, adaptive optic unit, spectrograph, and so on. Of course not all of these are mounted at the same time. In this case however a turret to select the component to use would also be in the mix.
So yeah, this could be handy....Any idea if you can do specific threads on one of these? Being lazy, I can look that up but if it doesn't do anything more than produce a working prototype before heading to the machine shop (really expensive) to produce a proven spacer it can be worth it.