Joined
·
439 Posts
This is mostly a curiosity question.
I was thinking of replacing my 1/4" shank Ryobi with a 1/2" router before building my table. I was looking at the Firestorm (B&D) referenced above - because of its low cost.
NOWHERE on the box or on B&D's website did it mention NOT using it in a table. But after I bought it and got it home and opened the manual --
there it was in big black outlined letters 'NOT for use in a router table' and 'DO NOT use this router in inverted position'.
The store very graciously allowed me to return it -- and I am very glad I read the manual BEFORE giving my brother my original router.
QUESTION:
Has anyone used this router? Do you have any idea why it would not be usable in a table?
Given that many/most people buying a 1/2" shank router are at least considering a table -- why would they market one that couldn't be used in that manner?
Or am I the only one who sees this as strange?
I was thinking of replacing my 1/4" shank Ryobi with a 1/2" router before building my table. I was looking at the Firestorm (B&D) referenced above - because of its low cost.
NOWHERE on the box or on B&D's website did it mention NOT using it in a table. But after I bought it and got it home and opened the manual --
there it was in big black outlined letters 'NOT for use in a router table' and 'DO NOT use this router in inverted position'.
The store very graciously allowed me to return it -- and I am very glad I read the manual BEFORE giving my brother my original router.
QUESTION:
Has anyone used this router? Do you have any idea why it would not be usable in a table?
Given that many/most people buying a 1/2" shank router are at least considering a table -- why would they market one that couldn't be used in that manner?
Or am I the only one who sees this as strange?