I started with Mach4 on an old desktop computer for my CNC and unless that computer dies then I won't have those issues. I have read that ArtSoft isn't difficult to deal with if you do need to move the software but it's probably not a 10 minute process.

David

 

LinuxCNC is quite capable and mature. Both LinuxCNC and Mach4 have specific hardware requirements. The Avid supplied controllers utilize an Ethernet SmoothStepper, which works very well with Mach4, but DOES NOT work with LinuxCNC.

LinuxCNC was originally developed to to work off parallel port, and still works that way, if you are using a computer with parallel port or a desktop you can put a parallel port card in. You will also need to build your own controller that takes the parallel port signal and connects to the stepper drivers. There are limitations to a parallel port, and how fast of step generation it can handle. A better solution with LinuxCNC is to use a supported card by Mesa that performs certain hardware step generation. The cost of this board is probably equivalent to purchasing Mach4. Again, you would need to integrate with a controller yourself.

 

Now that's a valid reason to go with Mach4! Thank you!

I'm trying to learn. I appreciate it.

 

I have been using ESS/Mach4 for almost 5 years and have zero complaints or issues. I have also purchased a UCCNC license and motion controller for a future build as people whose opinion I respect (such as Gerry) have good things to say about it. As long as you stay away from Mach3 or GRBL, I think most of the other choices can be made to work well. I know that both Mach3 and GRBL have their proponents, but I do not feel they are in the same tier of capability or reliability.

 

How much of a learning curve is it to go from Mach3 to Mach4 for a gumpy old fart?

 

Five minutes for a normal guy, so maybe four for you.

David

 

I'm not familiar with Mach 3 or 4, so I guess my learning curve is just moving into 4 from the start. I contacted the company after BalloonEngineer responded above. Since I don't have the computer it will run the software on yet, they told me to download the software play with it before buying the license so I can get a little used to it. I ordered the computer that it will run on today so it is coming together. I just wanted to know that it was worth the cost of the software when the "internet" touted other options that are free. I just wanted to make sure it was necessary and of value.

 

The process of loading and running gcode is virtually the same, and display is similar. Mach4 is easier to customize or modify screens, but since Gerry has not chosen to develop any Mach4 screen sets, I run one of the standard ones. Most of the features of his Mach3 screenset are in the standard Mach4 profile I use.

The advantage is the quality and speed of carve, especially 3D. Mach4 just has a better 3D motion planner than Mach3 and better CV algorithms. I have friends with expensive Legacy machines that run Mach3. They spent weeks and did hundreds of test cuts trying to get smooth performance in a test piece for a door carving. Played with feed rates, plunge, chip loads, spindle rpm, etc. But it always had little overshoots when going downwards and clipped edges coming up. I ran their exact same gcode file on my machine and it cut perfect. First try. Exactly like the Aspire preview, and what they were trying to accomplish. Same feed rates, plunge rates, etc. Their $16k welded steel machines (Maverick 3x5) with Nema34 steppers running Mach3 just could not cut as nice as my bigger (4 x 5), aluminum extrusion (stiffer!), Nema23, under $3k DIY machine running Mach4. Both their machines and mine use the same ESS motion controller.

IMHO, Mach3 is deprecated, has not been updated since 2012 (and never will be in future), and has trouble with newer versions of windows. If you have a Mach3 machine you are happy with, not sure I would upgrade, but it’s a no-brainer to go Mach4 on a new build.

 

I didn't know Mach3 vs Mach4 was controversial. But I'm new to this CNC stuff. I use Artcam to design and make the Gcode. My choice was Mach3 to run the Gcode via USB to a Chinese 3 axis CNC router.The old PC I use has Win10 64 bit OS. This setup works great for my projects. The only problem I run into is operator error.

 

So as an interested bystander, is it possible to download and practice using a program such as Mach 4 without have a CNC connected? That may seem ridiculous but if you wanted to see 1st hand how hard it would be to run where pr how could you do this without access to a CNC? Hope this makes some sense.....like maybe a simulator?

 

i agree Steve. practice runs on the control sofware may be limited to getting familiar with the features/buttons on the control screen, and reading the manual for the respective machine responses. but, it will gain you some familiarity you didn't have before.

doing a "test run" with the drawing software (CAD) can be much more beneficial, as you can visualize the work as it is performed, and, even generate toolpaths. some have simulate features that can catch some errors. Although you can expect some need for tweeking when the time comes to do the cutting...

 

I believe so, yes. It's been a while since I looked but I think you can actually set it up and run a machine in test mode. There's a limit to how many lines of code, though.

David

 

I think if you purchased the Avid CNC to make things as a hobbyist then Mach is fine. If your looking to turn your new found hobby quickly into a business then it may be wise to invest in a better controller. Perhaps even if you plan to stick with hobby level stuff you have the time to change to a different controller as your not stressed about downtime.

I was a Mach user for a few years but decided to make the change as I wanted standardization. I own a few different machines (router, lathe, mill), while Mach gives me the ability to control all of them with the same control system, I wasn't getting the support I enjoy and since then moved to Centroid for all my controllers and am a happy customer.

One of the advantages from changing the controller is you will fully understand the system. If your Avid with Mach springs a loose wire for the proximity switches, do you know how to trace it down and put it back in the correct input (as an example). With Avid CNC you build the system so you understand the mechanical but when changing the controller you can understand the electrical and diagnose any problem that may occur.

 

Mike, I'm wondering now, when you ordered your machine did you get the plug and play controller with it? If you got the plug and play controller I would go with the Mach4 software because they have worked out the compatibility for their system right down to the configuration file and post processor. If you did not get the plug and play controller and plan on building the controller yourself then you have several choices, Mach4, UCCNC, and Centroid would be my choices. I would stay away from the free control software and controllers because they are somewhat limiting. Just make sure the components you buy for the controller are compatible.

If I remember there is an offline demo mode in Mach3, not sure about Mach4.

John, from what I hear Mach4 is a lot smoother than Mach3 but there would be a slight learning curve. Also, before I changed to Mach4 I would make sure everything in the controller is compatible with Mach4, some of the components they use now might be different versions, call Avid and check with them first.

 

One issue that I have is Mach being tied to a particular machine.

If you buy the license from Artsoft, you'll have an account at their website where you can log in and generate your own license files. As a hobbyist, you can generate a license for up to 5 PC's I think. And if you have 5 PC's die, you can contact Artsoft to get more licenses. Their website doesn't explain this nearly as well as it should, and it probably costs them business.

 

Mach4 is easier to customize or modify screens

For basic screens, yes, but in some ways it's more limiting than Mach3, and complex customization is much more complex than Mach3 imo. But Mach4 itself is far superior to Mach3.
If the initial releases weren't the disaster that they were, I may have actually used it. I have both a Mach4 hobby and Mach4 industrial license.

 

I'm hoping this machine control software discussion is still on people's minds: just getting into CAM now that I have adequately explored Fusion 360 to produce my designs and toolpaths. Still undecided on the machine control. I prefer Mac OS X software when possible (sorry, just a thing with me; not judging) so in the process of researching options, I discovered PlanetCNC which is Mac and PC and apparently open-source. has anyone here tried it? have familiarity with it? I don't honestly know what type of customization i might need in the future, so would like to year comments on that?

My router is a 2nd-hand, 2011 Laguna Swift 4X4. The water-cooled spindle died (seized, due to the pump failing) before I bought the mill, so I've already ordered a new spindle on Amazon.

Any feedback appreciated and welcome

 

I do not believe that Planet CNC is open source. But it does have an API for customization.
I'm surprised it's available for a Mac. I didn't think there were any controls that would run on a Mac.
I know of a few people using Planet CNC that have been happy with it. I think it's a lot more popular in Europe, where the company is located.
Compared to the other popular controls, I'd guess that Planet CNC has maybe 0.5% of the market, based on what I've seen on the various CNC forums I read.
You might consider using a small mini PC just to run the machine, which opens the door to a lot more options.

 

Thanks for your input, Ger... in the meantime, it seems i have found another worthy option: its called OpenBuilds - they make free (open source) control software, and sell the CNC Touch Interface - it has wifi too (that would replace a RichAuto pendant for example) and also sell a Blackbox controller since the controller I have currently is using a serial port connection which seems dodgy at best.

Know anyone using this type of system and with something OTHER than the mills that are available on the OpenBuilds website?

 

I'm sure the OP has resolved his questions but responding to the follow on question. Open Builds is basically a Grbl shop. "Control" is a Grbl Sender - needs grbl running on the controller. Their "Interface" (hand held device) is also a Grbl sender (with lots of sharp edges, the case is made of PCB material). Their Black Box is an 8 bit 3 Axis Grbl based controller. They do support a ganged Y drive (2 motors on the Y axis). It can be used with any 3 Axis CNC Router or Mill.

For what it is worth, there are modern 32 bit versions of grbl out there that perform significantly better than 8 bit grbl, in particular grblHAL which runs on a number of microcontrollers and supports up to 6 axes. I have an Avid Pro4848 coming fairly soon that I will use grblHAL to run. I make and sell a grblHAL breakout board that uses a Teensy 4.1 (600 mHz) and supports 5 Axes including 2 sets of ganged axes if desired. I will be writing up and publishing my experience using it with the Pro4848.