Router Forums banner
1 - 7 of 35 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
31,266 Posts
poor quality limited ply plywood can easily turn in an exercise in futility...
clean your cutters often because of the glue...
rapid tooling dulling is a given because of the glue also...
make sure your tooling is as sharp as it can be...
waste boards are a must...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
31,266 Posts
the pointy ones are the finger joint...

.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: TenGees

· Registered
Joined
·
31,266 Posts

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: CharleyL

· Registered
Joined
·
31,266 Posts
un-huh...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DesertRatTom

· Registered
Joined
·
31,266 Posts
My point was and still is that many people, including most of the group I consider master woodworkers, still refer to the box joint as first being a finger joint. When someone says finger joint it's not a given that they are talking about splicing lumber. If you paid attention to the sources in the links I gave you saw some very respectable sources referring to what you call a box joint as a finger joint, the reason being that the individual projections are called fingers and that when joined together they look like interlaced fingers, no matter what size they are. It's how I refer to them because that's how I learned to refer to them a very long time ago. You guys can argue all you want to but unless you know a way to change history then the traditional way to refer to that joint is as a finger joint.
calling it what it isn't till it's accepted doesn't make it a correct descriptive...
an element of a box joint is called a finger..
but the final product is a box joint...
it is not a finger joint...
so call it what its, a box joint...
let's call the receiver for the ''finger'' a pocket... so now we have a pocket joint???
 
  • Like
Reactions: CharleyL

· Registered
Joined
·
31,266 Posts
You missed a lot of the conversation Larry. They were always called finger joints until only recently when, as Charley pointed out, the manufacturers started referring to them as something else. The ones with tapered fingers were called just that or were called splice joints. If you find old literature, that will be the nomenclature you find. When I read articles in Fine Woodworking almost all of their contributors refer to a box joint as a finger joint. Most of those guys went through a training period by old masters. One of the very first contributors to FWW was Tage Frid (pronounced Tay) who was a Danish born and educated master. I'm not sure if FWW would have made it without him. He was trained the old fashioned (European) way and started as an apprentice in a traditional European wood shop. That's what he called the joint in his book on how to make wood joints. It's an excellent book by the way, one of the best woodworking books I've ever read. So that was how he was taught by an even older master than himself. And so on, and so on, and so on.

Maybe one day the terminology will change. Ain't was't in the dictionary when I was young but it is now. Maybe one day no one will refer to it as a finger joint anymore but for now you can still find as many or more references to it being a finger joint and those references are from professional sources. In the mean time the one thing that should happen is for everyone to quit correcting people who call it the other term. It IS a finger joint. It also IS a box joint. Both are correct.
and this all boiled down says to eat dung because 500 bazillion flies can't possibly be wrong...
 
1 - 7 of 35 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top