How much material is removed with 3/4" radius roundover bit?
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Joined
·
16,386 Posts
Hi and welcome. I’m curious why you would want to round it off that much? I would probably only use a 1/4r at the most.
Joined
·
15,464 Posts
Guitar; Hey, welcome!
No, but there is a an issue. If you draw a 2" square, find the exact center, and scribe a 2" circle inside the square, the circumference will be perfectly mated to the perimeter. Visually, each of the four sides will flow smoothly into the arc.
That doesn't happen if your circle is larger than the square. When you slide the arc back so that it's within the square, the arc creates an edge, or angle if you like, where it intersects with only two of the adjacent sides where it's still tangent.
Try the 3/4 bit on a piece of 5/8" scrap; nothing bad will happen. Obviously, the same thing doesn't happen when you use a smaller radius bit.
This discussion has happened here in the past; a lot of us use small radius bits (1/8" R.) for rounding over on a regular basis.
If you're worried about the appearance, maybe buy some/a smaller rad. bit?
No, but there is a an issue. If you draw a 2" square, find the exact center, and scribe a 2" circle inside the square, the circumference will be perfectly mated to the perimeter. Visually, each of the four sides will flow smoothly into the arc.
That doesn't happen if your circle is larger than the square. When you slide the arc back so that it's within the square, the arc creates an edge, or angle if you like, where it intersects with only two of the adjacent sides where it's still tangent.
Try the 3/4 bit on a piece of 5/8" scrap; nothing bad will happen. Obviously, the same thing doesn't happen when you use a smaller radius bit.
This discussion has happened here in the past; a lot of us use small radius bits (1/8" R.) for rounding over on a regular basis.
If you're worried about the appearance, maybe buy some/a smaller rad. bit?
Joined
·
15,464 Posts
After re-reading your original comment it occurred to me that what you're asking is if if the 3/4" rad. will remove too much of the joint!
Will it damage the fingers? Yeh, I'd be worried too! Perhaps try Charles's suggestion of a 1/4" rad. first; you can always re-cut it with the larger bit if you don't like the look...or you really want to risk it.
By the way, you didn't mention whether this is handheld or being done on a router table?
Will it damage the fingers? Yeh, I'd be worried too! Perhaps try Charles's suggestion of a 1/4" rad. first; you can always re-cut it with the larger bit if you don't like the look...or you really want to risk it.
By the way, you didn't mention whether this is handheld or being done on a router table?
Joined
·
15,464 Posts
Makes sense now...I'd still personally do the 1/4" or 1/2" RO first. It'll remove some of the waste and give you a feeling for easily the material is peeling away. Can you back up the corners so the first and last fingers aren't damaged as the bit starts/leaves the cut? I think that'd be my major worry.
Guitar; this is why the members like to see a bit of info in the profile about what tools and experience the poster has. I get the feeling you're way above the newbie level!
It really helps members when they're replying to the comment. We love helping out folks just getting into woodworking, but there are several members here with years (decades) of commercial/production experience who are excellent resources for more
technical issues.
Joined
·
22,926 Posts
The backing, glued in and fitted tight, will let you use a larger rountover bit without losing strength. When I look at PA and loarge studio speaker cabinets, I notice that they have large roundovers, however, most are made of MDF. It is very hard to get a grip on such an edge, given how heavy speakers and ply are. So I hope you're working on some sort of grip, possibly a recessed grip. I do AV for our senior group and hate wrestling with large, gripless speakers. Not sure there's much advangage to using box joints if you're going to do roundovers, and even less advantage if you're going to cover the outside of the box with some sort of fabric.
Joined
·
901 Posts
Worth a Thousand Words . . .
Joined
·
31,266 Posts
thanks for putting it down on paper..
Joined
·
16,386 Posts
If the joint will be visible then it’s worth doing for the appearance of it if that’s important to you. Otherwise you are removing so much material that may not be worth the effort. In that case you might as well use a simple butt joint. I often use that joint with piece behind it drilled then glued and screwed to both sides. The backer piece is the one that gives the joint it’s strength then and they hold together just fine that way.
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
