Router Forums banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
587 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I have done many home renovations and have always used plywood as underlaymet or sheathing. Looking at some new homes going up locally and in the mid to high six figure range, see that most have OSB as sheathing. My very few times using this material is that it absorbs moisture, swells and disintegrates. Good exterior plywood seldom will. Plywood also has some flexibility while OSB crumbles.

This leads me to my question - why are builders/remodlers using this inferior product so extensively? The cost savings can't be that much plus it's a lot hard to handle, ofteb breaking, negating any costsavings. Or am I all wrong:surprise:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jw2170

·
Registered
Theo
Joined
·
6,919 Posts
I'm with the "because it's cheaper" crowd. Surprising how cheap home builders can be, and at the same time so wasteful. My son is in air conditioning, and a lot of times they would work in new subdivisions going up. He got two pallets of new, never unbanded, oak flooring at one, for free. Reason he got them? Because the builders had finished at that site, were moving on to another, and were about to burn both pallets, because they felt the effort of taking them along was too much bother. Apparently that happens a lot, but most times anyone else was too late to ask for whatever, because they had already torched it. I got given a whole stack of it, use it for various projects, but still have a bunch left.

And I much prefer plywood.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,704 Posts
Contractors are usually after the biggest bang for the buck. I did high end multiple zone comfort systems (HVAC). The controls were, at the time either Carrier, Trane, or Honeywell. These systems used a series of networked thermostats, return air sensors, supply air sensors, and outdoor temperature sensors. If installed they could be connected via internet connection for reprogramming or just monitoring. If properly designed the systems could cut operating costs considerably but their main attraction was in the ability to heat/cool the whole house effectively by zones where one thermostat could only satisfy the temperature at it's one location. I had homes with 10-12 zones that were balanced by separate thermostats in each zone that kept the entire home comfortable and each thermostat was programmed for its needs by time and temperature. It was a major advance in home comfort and troubleshooting of the system was possible remotely.

Then I did homes of comparable size and worth that used contractor grade equipment, fiberglass ductboard, and a few central returns. These systems I wouldn't put in my own home for several reasons the 1st being ductboard is a material made of fiberglass sheeting material that has a rough surface and over time the fiberglass particles come loose and gets blown into the air stream. So lower air flow due to resistance, uncomfortable when the fiberglass particles get blown on you, and far less efficient equipment and operating conditions. And many of these in very expensive developments. The money was spent on what you could see. Appliances, lighting and plumbing fixtures, and so on. Comfort was secondary and easy to cut cost on so when a contractor uses material of lesser quality it often has to do with what can be seen and quantity. The bottom line is profit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
944 Posts
The only reason it is used extensively is the cost ! there is a huge saving, the average person doesn't see it because we only buy a few sheets at a time. When a contractor builds several homes as you mentioned higher price range means larger means more square feet means more sheets. If the savings are close to $10 per sheet, imagine when you're buying a truckload !!! we are talking thousands of dollars. I sell equipment to panel mills across Canada and sometimes I am amazed at how much of this stuff is consumed. I use it for some applications but I much prefer plywood for being solid mass. My shop walls are all OSB and I must find studs to screw anything substantial to the walls. I was teaching my students yesterday about the different sheet goods and their applications and I said if I ever win a lottery and have a high end home built, it would be plywood, not OSB. The manufacturing cost is much lower because the fibre used can be in any type of wood and some low quality trees are used for the savings. Everything gets shredded to the size you see on a finished sheet and then it's dried to remove the moisture, then formed in several layers of a combination of these shavings and glue, which is then pressed with tons of pressure and heat to form the large sheets that are then cut to 4' x 8'. There is a coating on one side that is somewhat weather resistant but I think if plywood was priced equally no one would use OSB !
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
587 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
It looks like our current home was well built then as it is entirely sheathed in plywood. The builder who did our home for all intents, developed the town, building over 2000. He bought in train loads. For the most part used dang good materials with Caradco windows being the one place where he skimped. I recently watched the 16 new, big buck homes being built in a new development behind us and by a different builder. The crap that was hidden and the quality of workmanship is deplorable for the prices they brought.

I didn't think there was that much of a price difference between OSB and CDX plywood - but then when you buy one sheet or two at a time,.... :surprise:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,704 Posts
When we built our home in 2002 I was recovering from bilateral arthroscopic surgery. Although it wasn't pleasant and I had the contractor I wanted I was there every day to oversee the project. The home was by our design and the blueprints were revised very slightly by the builder as I was open to suggestions. I had several bids on the build and they were all close but I did question on the materials to be used. There were no shortcuts made and I was already getting a deal that couldn't be topped as the company I worked for was doing the mechanical work and I got everything at cost from those supply houses which means electrical, plumbing, and HVAC. Cost being suppliers cost not my company cost. It was a long standing deal our suppliers had with it's major commercial customers.

Framing was almost overbuilt. When I go on the roof to inspect there is no bounce. I also documented the work as it progressed. I could locate any pipe under the basement concrete floor without a problem as well as any electrical wiring path. Any and all penetrations through the studs was fire blocked. It is my strong belief that if you are paying to have a home built you need to see what is being done and how. Ask questions and take notes/pictures. The inspector is supposed to be checking that everything is to code but I really don't want to tell some of those stories. You should have seen the faces of those older inspectors when they saw me running furnace exhaust pipe using PVC pipe. Yes it was when condensing gas furnaces 1st came out and the vent gas was maybe 85 degrees. I remember having Leroy sit down on a bucket and look over the manufacture's specs. The look on his face and the many "I'll be" I heard that afternoon.

Just saying it pays to inspect the home while it's under construction and ask questions.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top