Router Forums banner

Fingers too close to the whirly thing

Tags
safety
11K views 50 replies 24 participants last post by  TWheels  
#1 ·
You may have seen this. . . it is interesting.
Wonder how it tells fingers from wood? It looks like it takes 6-7 teeth before it stops which still could cause some serious damage.

Not a bad idea. It looks like to me they use an explosive device the release the brake.

MSN Entertainment -
 
#2 ·
Hi Steve, I believe the Saw Stop uses electronic technology to detect the difference.

A wet piece of timber will set it off.
 
#3 ·
Steve, I've seen it up close and personal.... a woodworking store in Detroit had a demo of it a couple of years ago. Amazing technology, and it DOES work, just like in the video clip. Expensive initial purchase, and expensive when it works... blade is toast, as is the mechanism that stops the blade. But, it's still cheaper than the alternative.....
 
#5 · (Edited)
Mike I think that anyone who wanted to use this should not be discouraged from doing that, Me I would never use anything like this, I doubt that it would save a finger anyway, at what point does it kick in? Does it kick in when your finger is say a CM away, every accident that I have ever seen happened very fast, there was no a slow build up where the hand was inched forward a bit more and then a bit more so that when it was just a cm away then the device could kick in, me I would never believe that this could 100% stop the saw blade from cutting off your finger when your finger is a cm away and moving in fast, this is a fake solution and there is no solution better than keeping your eyes open and your fingers away from any fast moving cutter and I personally would not want to ever think that, "Its OK Neville to get close to the saw as the saw stop will save me'. The proper solution is to operate the saw, or the router, or the angle grinder, or the lawn mower, or the chain saw, properly, how do you stop yourself from cutting your leg off with the chain saw? You do that by showing dangerous tools respect, and me I would never want anything between me and any tool, I plan to keep my eyes open and use good trade practice and I would say to anyone who thought that the saw was so dangerous that they needed this, to go out and buy a nice pocket knife and take up whittling. You know when cars were first invented then anyone who owned one had to pay a person to walk along in front of it ringing a bell and waving a flag, and that never did work in regard to stopping anyone from walking under it wheels, what worked was to educate people to keep there eyes open and every time that they do then they don't get run over. N
 
#6 · (Edited)
Hi Steve, I have A SawStop and would not operate another saw. I had a small board kick back and the brake immediately stopped the blade. I thought the saw had malfunctioned. I unplugged the saw and was looking at the blade/brake (the blade immediately drops below the table top & the motor stops). Then I notice a small amount of blood (about 2 drops) on one of my fingers. It looked like I had scraped the skin with a fingernail. The blade and brake were shot. I contacted SawStop and they said if I sent them the brake they they could read the computer chip to see what happened & would send me a free brake. Best piece of equipment in my shop. I have never understood the argument for not getting a SawStop. If you are careful you want get hurt or that since you have a SawStop you will take more chances. I don't buy either argument. If I have seat belts in my truck I don't take any more chances with my driving than without seat belts. Even if I am the only vehicle on the road I wouldn't take a chance of driving without the seat belts. And if a person is concerned about the cost of the saw I tell them to contact the nearest emergency room and ask roughly what would be the cost if you came in with a couple fingers that were hacked off. Then compare that with the price of the saw. Malcolm / Kentucky USA
 
#11 ·
Malcome,
Did the Sawstop keep the kick back hurt you? Did the brake prevent the kick back?

I'm finding that I am more apt to get hurt by a kick back than getting my fingers into the blade. Of course a kick back normally is not as bas as losing a couple of fingers. In regard to kick backs, I have learned the hard way not to try to rip short pieces. On a ten inch saw I's say not to try rip anything shorter than 12" as you are asking for trouble especially if the workpiece is narrow. Just don't try it, I found out the hard way.

I do think that eventually a Saw Stop will end up in my shop, hope I still ten fingers to use when the day comes to set it up. Wonder if Obama Care would cover the cost of one, they are into preventive medicine pretty heavy these days.

Jerry
 
#7 ·
Neville, the brake is triggered by contact with your skin and it is so fast that you will not realize you made contact until you see that the blade is stopped below the table.
 
#25 ·
Mike as I said, I would never let my fingers be near the saw blade, saw safety requires good trade practices when using a saw, these good practices wash over in regard to the use of other dangerous tools, I had on Idiot customer that cut of his finger with a compressor belt, he said that it looked funny so he was trying to see what could be done about that, while it was running, I was happy that he did not have a saw table as he may have cut his arm off, there is no cure for stupidity, you cannot get hurt by any saw blade as long as you don't touch it, use a push stick, use saw fences, keep your work area clean, keep the saw blade sharp, use hearing protection, use eye protection, I will never lose my life crossing the road as I will not be stepping in front of a car while reading a newspaper and listening to my I Pod and texting on my phone as I walk blindly across the road. Anyone who thinks that they need this should not own a dangerous without doing a workshop course on saw/tool/machine safety. N
 
#8 ·
I have this visualization of a red zone around the blade of any saw. It is about 6-7 inches in diamater. I cannot bring myself to move my hands any closer than that, ever. I also use a Grriper for all cuts where I'm not using a sled. I understand the idea of the saw stop, but I often work with high moisture redwood for outdoor projects, and if you forget to turn off the Saw Stop cartridge, wham, there goes a blade and the cartridge. I do such projects all the time and I am certain I'd forget now and again. So I use great caution, eliminate all distractions, plan every aspect of a rip or cross cut before I even raise the blade above the table. I like the Saw Stop idea, but the model I can afford is not a cabinet saw while my Laguna Fusion is. I respect anyone's choice of gear, I just want to have the option to make a choice. If I had a commercial shop, I'd buy the more expensive SawStops just for the liability issue and the safety would be a bonus.
 
#9 ·
It is a nice feature however pretty expensive. If I had to get one of those I would not have a saw as it would be more than I would be able to put into a hobby. Hiring someone else to cut your wood is always a safety option but it would not be much fun. Being electronic it could malfunction as easy as a guy that puts his hand into a blade. The only way you would know it did not work is after your fingers are gone.

If you do not think electronic things will fail, why unplug your saw or router before changing a blade or bit? Just my opinion based on my situation and experience, yours may be different.
 
#12 ·
My question on the technology is if it works only when the motor is powered, or as long as the blade is spinning. My uncle damaged 2 fingers (severed tendon) by a saw that was coasting down. It would be interesting to know if there is a protection for this type of injury.

This technology looks promising, but still a few years out to refit old saws.

Whirlwind Black Box Videos
 
#13 ·
Mike I see this as being the same as being hit by a train, I have a cousin who was, he is an idiot who would regularly cross the tracks in a dangerous way and why? well he was just trying to avoid a few minutes of inconvenience, save himself a few minutes of time, cut 60 meters off his walk home, he would do this every day, jump the track and cross it in a dangerous manner and use a method that the no one should ever do and 'yes' he was hit by a 2000 ton train, and this impact did not hurt the train at all, the only thing that had to happen to the train is that it needed a wash, Richard was not killed but he is a vegetable, I can't decide myself if he is more like a cabbage or a pumpkin as his head injury was catastrophic and it would have been better for him to have died however the contact with the train was on his head and he did not die from that injury so as the rest of him is undamaged then he can look forward to a long life of being a turnip, I often wonder what does go on inside his new brain, of course he could have stayed off the damn track and not been hit by that train. For me to give a proper opinion about this then I would need to see the promotional material that is used to sell it, I would need to read about whatever it is that is the trigger that kicks the device into action, just now I cannot see what that trigger could be so that it could work when needed and not work when it should not kick in, I know myself how litigious the USA is so I hope that the company that sells it has good insurance because the first time that this device fails and the first time that some inexperienced person loses their fingers then it is all over. It is far better to tell any user of any dangerous tool to not get on the track or you will be hit by a train. In regard to the use of powerful and dangerous tools then there is no substitute for safe and sound procedures and anyone who thinks that they can use unsafe procedures and cross the track in a dangerous way! Sooner or later they will be hit by a train. Neville
 
#19 ·
In regard to the use of powerful and dangerous tools then there is no substitute for safe and sound procedures and anyone who thinks that they can use unsafe procedures and cross the track in a dangerous way! Sooner or later they will be hit by a train. Neville
Neville, while if have not made m own decision, couldn't it be argued that the SawStop is another safe and sound procedure to be used along with sleds AND safety glasses AND push sticks/GRIPPERRR AND other safety measures? Not instead of any of them.
 
#15 ·
Neville pretty much said what I would have. I wouldn't have a Saw Stop, just seems like it would lead to carelessness. I'll just keep on doing what I've been doing, being very careful.
 
#17 · (Edited)
The amazing thing is this idea came from a "lawyer". The second amazing thing is when he approached the manufacturers to sell his idea they were not interested so he formed his own company. Now you know why they cost so much (he doesn't want some lawyer suing him) lol. The saw does work as advertized. The electronics "reads" the moisture content in the skin (or test hot dog) and the blade is stoped instantaneously by a super strong spring device. It jams the blade into a phenolic block. I managed to nick a finger while doing a cut "by the book" so even the safest procedure can still result in an accident. When I returned from the ER I tried to replicate the scenario ( with the saw unplugged, of course) and to this day can not tell you why it happened. Guess that is why they call them accidents.
 
#20 ·
Steve and others on this thread
Why don't they demonstrate the saw with a figure instead of a hot dog if it's so foolproof?
I don't believe anything will ever be invented that will surpass the human brain to prevent accidents. Most are a lapse of mental function some how. Yes, after 50 plus years in the trade I've had my share of " accidents" . When I think back I doubt that any of them weren't preventable if my brain had been engaged!
To me the SawStop is just another high priced " gotta have" . There is no substitute for using your head and working safely. That said, I also realize that a person with many years experience can probably do a lot of things safely that are dangerous for a novice.
Dennis
 
#21 ·
Steve,

I think that's a valid point. There is a whole field on job safety dedicated to 'hierarchy of control' tro prevent people from harm in industry, and it has many layers of defense. I won't bore you with the details, but I'll put a link below. I used to push back against this a little when I was 'young and invincible' at work, now I have to use it to keep my guys safe.

Unfortunately, I have seen too many times in my career that a worker (usually VERY new or VERY experienced) will identify with one layer of protection, and assume it is sufficent for the job... that's where the problem lies in my opinion.

Accidents WILL happen, because we as imperfect humans will err in our procedures, or because our imperfect machines will fail at the worst possible time. Any additional layer of protection we can provide ourselves with is a good investment.

One of my favorite examples is how we operate automobiles. The addition of safety equipment in cars has had a positve and negative effect on vehicle safety. Seat belts and airbags save lives, yet give folks a greater feeling of invincibility in the car. ABS and traction control help inexperienced drivers avoid accidents in slippery conditions, but cause experienced drivers to push their limits. Rear backup cameras, lane change alerts, and self parking dumb down the driver by allowing him to get by without having to learn key driving skills.

The same is true in woodworking. However, I would not speak against new safety devices if they added a real layer of protection at a reasonable inconvenience to the task. I have been bitten by a tool in the past, and it was due to a mental error on my part caused by a distraction. It was a humbling learning experience that I would have preferred not to have. If a technology like the 'whirlwind' above becomes available, I will probably retrofit my saw.

To quote a co-worker who lost a chunk of his finger, "all that safety stuff is pretty cheap compared to the cost my medical bills!"

ISO 9001 Quality Systems Toolbox - Hierarchy of Controls
 
#26 ·
Depends on the students. I'm thinking with today's students, the schools are going to pay out a lot of money because of students putting hot dogs thru them.

When I took shop, you had to be in the 10th grade, before you were allowed to use the table saw. Which would put me at 14 at the time. The teacher demonstrated kickback, told us how it occurs, how to avoid it, and to never do it. I never heard of any kickback incidents in that school.

And, when he told us to keep our body parts away from the whirly parts, we listened. The man did not have the complete set of two thumbs and eight fingers. We definitely listened. After that little speech, we were allowed to use the table saw unsupervised. Again, I never heard of any table saw accidents in that school. Being as I'm 73 now, never had a kickback accident, or a table saw accident, I guess he got the point across quite well.
 
#27 ·
I must disagree with you on this Neville. People who do not know how to use a power tool could benefit from this tech. No, they should not be using the saw but if it can save their fingers that is a good thing. Accidents do happen. I had my foot slip one time and my push stick was mangled. Using that push stick saved my fingers and maybe hand. Now I use MicroJig products instead of simple push sticks. Improving safety is never a bad thing.
 
#28 ·
As strange as this may sound, i believe you are all right. Sort of a "that's why they make chocolate and vanilla". We all use various types of safety devices around tools. In it's simplest form, some us will hold a small brad with our fingers when we hammer it into a board. I prefer needle nose pliers. I'm a klutz. If someone tells me they always use their fingers and would never think of using a pliers that doesn't make them wrong in my eyes. That works for them so they should keep on doing it. I'll still keep on using a pliers.

In terms of the saw stop, i can't afford one. If i could i'd probably buy one. Why? Well, I use the blade guard on my band saw. I use various types of pads and pushers on my jointer. I use feather boards and push sticks with my router. I always wear safety glasses, frequently wear a dust mask and, when needed, i wear hearing protection. Basically, I try to do things to keep myself safe since I know that, from time to time, I will do something that isn't safe either intentionally or accidentally. To me, the Sawstop is one more level of safety device.

We each decide how many precautions we want to take when we work. To each there own. Should you get a Sawstop? It's up to you and there is no right or wrong answer to that question. Just my opinion.
 
#29 ·
I'm with you, Barry!
I had a thought this morning re the SawStop, however. The whole premise is based on moisture+salt ie. conductivity. If for any reason, the conductivity is interfered with...electronically or other wise, the user is unprotected but thinks he/she is.
Here's a scenario: user is hypoallergenic and puts an a pair of tight fitting nitrile gloves to rip some cedar lath, completely forgetting that they've just negated the SawStop functionality.
Sorry, but If I'm using my TS, I want to be in total control; not trusting some technology to do what I should be doing for myself.
As others have pointed out, unwittingly running a piece of damp-inside wood through the saw could also prove very costly. I use Red Cedar a lot, and more often than not it has a high moisture content, even if the surface is dry.
 
#30 ·
Pretty strange scenario and assumptions. Why would the user be more careless with gloves on? If for no other reason than the cost of a replacement blade one assumes the user will exercise normal safe sawing procedures. As for damp wood users report there is no problem with damp - it is wet that is a potential problem.
 
#31 ·
Dennis; you just proved my point re damp vs wet. Make an error in judging the internal moisture content and it'll cost you a blade and Sawstop components.
If the user is always doing everything safely, then why upgrade to SawStop?
A lot of people have taken to wearing the skin tight nitrile gloves in the shop. I certainly do; just not around power tools!
Another thought occurred to me after watching that Vimeo video. You can't (technically?) use a dado set with it. So, once again, becoming overconfident can betray the user while doing an inherently dangerous operation.
 
#33 ·
My experience has been that fortunately close calls have not caused me any serious injuries , but it has taught me "TO BE MUCH MORE CAREFUL THAN WHEN I FIRST STARTED TO WORK WITH WOODWORKING TOOLS".

Not all of us were fortunate enough to have taken woodworking in school and had a good instructor to teach us of the potential danger of the tools involved and how to prevent them. In my case, I learned by myself. For that matter, I am still learning as so many of us are.

Being very conscience of potential danger and taking appropriate preventive measures is all that one can do. If a person is not willing to understand the potential danger and will not act accordingly, perhaps they need to take up needle point, whatever that us.

Some people should never handle guns, use power saws, or get involved in woodoworking as well as other potentially dangereous activities.

Jerry
 
#34 ·
Some people should never handle guns, use power saws, or get involved in woodoworking as well as other potentially dangereous activities
Totally agree, Jerry.